ATTENTION:
BEFORE
YOU READ THE CHAPTER ONE OF THE PROJECT TOPIC BELOW, PLEASE READ THE
INFORMATION BELOW.THANK YOU!
INFORMATION:
YOU CAN
GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT OF THE TOPIC BELOW. THE FULL PROJECT COSTS N5,000
ONLY. THE FULL INFORMATION ON HOW TO PAY AND GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT IS AT THE
BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. OR YOU CAN CALL: 08068231953, 08168759420
TERRORISM
AND NIGERIA'S EXTERNAL IMAGE UNDER GOODLUCK JONATHAN’S ADMINISTRATION
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the study
According to
Adebajo, (2014) the administration of ex-President Goodluck Jonathan can at
present be described as underperforming, and evaluation of its performance
shows in quite a lot of sectors. This also could be described as unfortunate for
a government which came to power on the back of popular aid, then had less
public goodwill in its early years (Adebajo, 2014). In the same vein,
Chinwokwu, (2013) asserted that Nigeria has certainly been confronted with
internal security disorders corresponding to acts of terrorism which has widely
affected its foreign relations coverage in the past government. Based on
Adebajo statement in 2014, Alabi, had already brought to light in 2012 by
saying that the influence of domestic events on the foreign policy of a country
cannot be over emphasized; this is on the ground that inner traits can steadily
metamorphose into disorders of worldwide concerns. Again, Chinwokwu opined that
terrorism certainly has impaired Nigeria’s image there by undermining its impact
in the international scene (Chinwokwu, 2013).
To support
Chinwokwu statement, Tsokwa in 2012 maintained that the emergence of terrorism
in Nigeria owing to the upward thrust of Islamic fundamentalism in Northern
Nigeria has broadly undermined the nation’s foreign coverage power. Boko Haram
hobbies in Nigeria have led to terrible reactions from corporations and
international positions have been littered with its events, thereby leads to
deterioration of international relations (Tsokwa, 2012). In addition, terrorist
acts in Nigeria using Boko Haram and others according to Madu, (2014) generated
a lot of interest of the world community raising questions about effective
approach on how presidency could attack the issue, which envisages that the
audacity persevered no tirelessly effort among the trouble group as this allow
daily victim, and expanded an alarming rate after each assault to most people
in which they lose confidence. Madu, further stated that the attacks on the
United Nation’s building at Abuja in 2011 resulted in undue stress on the world
group and Nigeria wanting to end the insurgency that began as a problem
(domestic violence) which appearance showed more during Goodluck Jonathan
government. The foregoing has grown to be necessary because of internationalization
of the conflict, Boko Haram was indoctrinated in a takfiri in 2009 (Madu (2014)
and it’s linked following the international terrorist Al -Qaeda businesses in
Islamic Maghreb (AQIM).
To shed more
light, Alabi, (2012) opined that terrorism is not only a Nigerian drawback; it
is a world obstacle. Neither is it a solely Islamic crisis. Extremists are to
be found in all religions. The crucial study is that, the increasing salience
of Islamist terror could also be defined by the special experiences of
Arab-Muslim societies and how faith has customarily been deployed as a weapon
of political struggle. Globalisation and the applied sciences related to the
growing internationalization, facilitated the potential of terror groups to
mobilise community and put into affecting their projects throughout countries
and communities (Alabi, 2012). Curiously enough, Tomis, (2011) maintained that
no one has ever been known to describe himself or herself as a terrorist.
Terrorism might probably even be a term of abuse (Tomis, 2011).
Correspondingly, Bamgbose, (2013) brought to light that a principal challenge
in seeking fully grasp terrorism is the fact that views range, depending on
where the country stands on a certain trouble.
For example, both Ronald Reagan in America and top Minister Margaret
Thatcher in Britain brushed aside the imprisoned Nelson Mandela and his
colleagues as “terrorists”. To their possess persons and to most Africans,
however, they were ‘freedom combatants’; heroes of an ancient wrestle for
liberation against Apartheid and racial humiliation (Bamgbose, 2013).
More so, the
African Union (AU) conference on Prevention and Combating Terrorism (A.U.C.P.C,
2012) defines terrorism as “any act which is a violation of the criminal law
that can endanger the existence, bodily integrity or freedom of, or rationale
critical injury or loss of life, factors may motive harm to public or exclusive
property, natural resources, environmental or cultural heritage and is
calculated or intended to: intimidate, put in fear, coerce or induce government
image and create public emergency; or create general insurrection in a State
(A.U.C.P.C. (2012).
However,
Madu (2014) argued that in an era of terror in the face of terrorism, the
Nigerian state is structured as an area of security for the population. The
Presidency, lawmakers and security agencies openly condemns terrorist attacks
as illegitimate action used by non-state actors. Consequently, the Nigerian
government, the National Assembly (NASS) undertook a statute to criminalize
terrorism through the Act (Establishment) Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission in 2002 (Madu, 2014). On the other hand, the inchoate nature of the
provisions to fight against terrorism led to the exploration of a more
comprehensive legal framework, and in turn to the presentation of terrorism
prevention Bill to the Senate in 2006 (Oghogho, (2011). Five years later, the
2011 Terrorism Prevention Act was passed by the Senate and the House on June 1,
2011 and June 2, 2011, he was sent by the Clerk of the National Assembly to the
President Goodluck Jonathan to sign the law.
As a result
of the severity of insurgency in Nigeria most especially during Goodluck
Jonathan regime happens not to be new, in that Olalekan, (2012) argued that
terrorism took a different dimensions since 2009 when internal terrorism in
Nigeria moved from ethnic militancy to suicide bombing, a situation that has
claimed over 3,000 lives, led to the declaration of state of emergency in five
northern states, and the sack of the Defence
Minister, Police Chief
and National Security
Adviser (Olalekan, 2012). According
to the United
States Department’s Global Report on Terrorism, Nigeria ranked 2nd with
593 deaths in 2011 from terrorist killings on the African continent, second to
only the failed state of Somalia. On the global level, Nigeria was placed 5th
in the ranking of casualties (Country Report on Terrorism, 2010).
Nigeria is
no stranger to terrorism, having experienced the activities of the extremist
sect Maitatsine movement that became violent in the early 1980s under the first
democratically elected civilian government of Alhaji Shehu Shagari. Yan Tatsine
(followers of Maitatsine) was actually a quasi-Muslim fringe group who preached
Islamic doctrines that were contrary to the teachings of the Islamic leadership
and orthodox society. Muhammadu Marwa Maitatsine, the leader of the sect, was a
Muslim scholar Marwa city in northern Cameroon who migrated to Kano in Nigeria
(Danjibo, 2000). The ideology of Maitatsine sect appealed to poverty - stricken
young people seeking the opportunity to confront the conservative governments
of domination and traditional Islamic state. Directive by the Federal
Government to the police force to crush the movement, which had large followership
of unemployed young people, has led to clashes with the police in Kano.
Encouraged by the ‘defeat’ of the police, the sect marched in Kano city
chanting “Yau zamu sha jinni”, meaning “today we shall drink blood” in Hausa.
Historically,
Bamgbose, (2013) maintained that no terrorist group has ever been created in a
vacuum; there are political dynamics, contexts, social, economic, temporal,
spatial, and even religious-which must be taken into account. Thus, a
considerable amount of emphasis on the identification of the range of
environmental conditions and grievances of members of the local population
facilitated the possibilities of domestic terrorism in Nigeria to gather
support and orchestrate acts of political violence. Similarly, Alabi, (2012)
opined that Nigeria's government has struggled to effectively deal with these
complaints and sources of tension across the country, and there is a widespread
belief especially among Nigerians North that the government continues to meet
the critical needs those who aspire to a better future. Although Tomis, (2011)
asserted that resources are certainly limited, it is the inequitable
distribution of resources, and widely recognized levels of corruption of
elites, which undermine the effectiveness of the government. In turn,
favoritism and corruption feeds a general perception that government officials
(to include the application of the law) cannot be trusted, and this further
undermines the government's ability to influence the behavior of members of
local communities in positive directions, away from the appeal of the radical
extremist ideologies such as Boko Haram (Tomis, 2011).
On the other
hand, as stated by Oghogho, (2011) Nigeria, a key strategic ally of the U.S.,
has come under attack by a radical Islamic sect known as Boko Haram (a Hausa
term for “Western education is forbidden”). Oghogho, maintained that it
officially calls itself “Jama’atul Alhul Sunnah Lidda’wati wal Jihad” which
means “people committed to the propagation of the Prophet’s teachings and
jihad.” As its name suggests, the group is adamantly opposed to what it sees as
a Western-based incursion that threatens traditional values, beliefs, and
customs among Muslim communities in northern Nigeria (Oghogh, 2011). Similarly,
Laolu, (2013) opined that in an audiotape posted on the Internet in January
2012, a spokesman for the group, Abubakar Shekau, even accused the U.S. of
waging war on Islam, the group is largely a product of widespread socioeconomic
and religious insecurities, and its ideology resonates among certain
communities because of both historical narratives and modern grievances
(Members of Boko Haram are drawn primarily from the Kanuri tribe roughly 4
percent of the population), who are concentrated in the northeastern states of
Nigeria like Bauchi and Borno, and the Hausa and Fulani (29 percent of the
population) spread more generally throughout most of the northern states.
Balogun, (2014) disclosed that since 2009, the group has attacked police
stations and patrols, politicians (including village chiefs and a member of
parliament), religious leaders (both Christian and Muslim), and individuals
whom they deem to be engaged in un-Islamic activities, like drinking beer. Boko
Haram has also carried out several mass casualty attacks and is the first
militant group in Nigeria to embrace the use of suicide bombings (Balogun,
2014).
Hence, the
study realize terrorism to mean all varieties of violent motion by clandestine
and semi-clandestine actors aimed at attaining criminal, army, religious,
political or different objectives, with such movements always directed at
executive and non-combatant populations with the deliberate objective of
spreading worry, anxiety and terror.
1.2 Statement of the problem
However,
Muyiwa, (2013) opined that Boko Haram expanded its terrorist attacks in Nigeria
to include international targets, such as the United Nations (UN) building in
Abuja in August 2011. The group also made significant leaps in its operational
capability, and there are indications that members of the group have received
weapons and training in bomb-making and other terrorist tactics from al-Qaeda
affiliates in the north and/or east of the continent (Muyiwa, 2013). According to
the United States Department’s Global Report on
Terrorism, Nigeria ranked 2nd with 593 deaths in 2011 from terrorist killings
on the African continent, second to only the failed state of Somalia. On the
global level, Nigeria was placed 5th in the ranking of casualties (Country
Report on Terrorism, 2010). Domestic terrorism has a long history in Nigeria.
Both south and north of the country have experienced acts of terrorism. Some
groups that pose the greatest security challenge in Nigeria include Niger Delta
Avengers, Militant, Boko Haram and others. These groups have adopted strategies
that included arson, kidnapping, extrajudicial killings, looting, illegal
detention, disappearances, and at worst, a suicide bombing. Although some of
these groups receive substantial support from the local population, the fact is
that sometimes their tactics of terrorism and poses a particular challenge for
the Nigerian military. Since the return to civilian rule, Nigeria has been
plagued with a series of violent agitations of various geo-political zones of
the country. These violent agitations that took terrorist dimensions
contributed to the threat of national security which is capable of
disintegrating the country. Terrorist attacks have led to the killing of
hundreds of people and the wanton destruction of property worth billions of
naira by bombing.
The
strategic implication of these acts of terrorism on the national security of
Nigeria is the thrust of this study, while the literature abound on the terrorism
"the terms" national security and more research is needed to
elucidate the link between terrorism and national security in Nigeria. Outright
confrontation with police and military officers, violent attacks against the
population, vandalizing a pipeline bombing of the installation of the oil, the
armed resistance against the agents of the Nigerian state and transnational oil
companies operating in the region, kidnappings and hostage taking have serious
strategic implications for Nigeria in the international community. Since the
activities of these terrorist groups, particularly since 1999, have not only
been a major threat to the security of the nation, but also make the country
one of the most dangerous places to live in the world. The activities of this sect
are able to disintegrate the country. Thus, the need to find a lasting solution
to the grievance of these groups is paramount.
Furthermore,
Ajibola, (2014) asserted that helping Nigeria confront this complex,
multifaceted terrorist threat is in the interests of the U.S. and the
international community. In early 2012, Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan
declared a state of emergency in four states—Yobe, Borno, Plateau, and Niger—in
concert with the deployment of armed forces, the temporary closing of international
borders in the northern regions, and the establishment of a special
counterterrorism force (Ajibola, 2014). In addition, Balogun, (2014) opined
that the above was done should in case the country’s latest efforts to confront
and defeat Boko Haram fail, in that the terrorist violence could worsen,
undermining an already fragile regime and possibly spilling over into
neighboring countries. As the region’s largest oil supplier, the global
economic impact of a prolonged campaign of terrorism could be severe. The human
toll of the terrorist violence is also reaching very worrisome levels; several
hundred Nigerians were killed or injured in Boko Haram attacks in just the
first two months of 2012 (Balogun, 2014).
1.3 Objective of the study
The general objective of this study is
to examine terrorism and Nigeria’s external image under Goodluck Jonathan’s
administration.
The specific
objectives are:
To determine the factors that influenced
terrorism during Goodluck Jonathan's administration.
To determine effects of terrorism on
Nigeria’s foreign relations under President Goodluck Jonathan administration.
To describe the nature and dynamics in
Nigeria’s image crisis under President Goodluck Jonathan administration
To find out if there were challenges in
implementing policies against terrorism under Goodluck Jonathan's
administration.
1.4 Research questions
What factors influenced terrorism in
Nigeria during Goodluck Jonathan's administration?
Did terrorism affect Nigeria’s foreign
relations under President Goodluck Jonathan administration?
What was the nature and dynamics in
Nigeria’s image crisis under President Goodluck Jonathan administration?
What were the challenges in implementing
policies against terrorism under Goodluck Jonathan's administration?
1.5 Significance of the study
The problem
of terrorism and its implications for national security in Nigeria is at the
heart of this research. It analyzes the implications of terrorism for Nigeria
in the international community. It is on this basis that this study is
important for some reason. First, the study is of paramount importance for
policy makers and citizens for it traces the historical development of domestic
terrorism in Nigeria, focusing on how corruption, ethno-political control of
resources , poor governance, poverty, beatings and blows against etc have all
added to the rise of terrorism in Nigeria. Second, the importance of Nigeria as
a global energy source inevitably led to a strong international presence in the
country; especially the US, China and Great Britain that depend on Nigeria for
much of their oil imports have important political and economic presence. It is
no coincidence that these countries in particular have played a key role in the
fight against terrorism policies in Nigeria and in the training of their military
for specific functions of the fight against terrorism. Thus, the international
stakeholder participation in terrorism in Nigeria becomes critical for this
study because it has raised more questions about that counter-terrorism
policies are adapted to, for what purpose. In essence, the research will
provoke more questions about domestic terrorism in Nigeria. Third, this
research will help to provide information on the terrorism in Nigeria, and what
it holds for other countries facing the challenges of terrorism. With amnesties
and fruitful dialogue that took place in the Niger Delta with the Movement for
the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) and the recent announcement of
ceasefire by the terrorist group Boko Haram, it means that domestic terrorism could
be won by the government through peaceful means dialogue. Fourth, it is useful
to researchers' particular political historians, dogmatic scientists,
economists and international relations professionals who conduct research in
related fields. Finally, the political class will learn through this study, the
need for them to be patriotic and it
is hoped that
this study will
contribute to the
future work on resolving
Nigerian conflict by
putting forth a
new perspective based
on using a
holistic perspective
1.6 Scope/Limitations of the study
This study
is on terrorism and Nigeria’s external image under Goodluck Jonathan’s
administration
1.7 Limitations of the Study
In the
production of such a work like this, the problem of the researcher is not the
scarcity of materials, but its availability including some bias in their
presentation. This research is contemporary and politically sensitive. The
researcher is thus faced with the problem of interpreting the actions of terrorist
groups and anti-terrorist approach of the Nigerian government that some of the
policies undertaken are still an ongoing process. Finally, there is the
question of time and money that could be a barrier to this research.
Nevertheless, these limiting factors were significantly managed to make the
study more objective in its presentation.
1.8 Definition of terms
Administration:
Is Goodluck Jonathan’s managements of public affairs; government properties,
supervision of projects and organization of persons during his tenure. .
Terrorism: Is the unofficial or unauthorized use of
violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims as well as illegal
use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a
government as well as the population civil, or part thereof, in furtherance of
political or social objectives.
External
image: is other people’s view of a particular thing, it could be is an
occurrence like terrorism that depicts visual perception.
HOW TO GET THE FULL PROJECT WORK
PLEASE, print the following
instructions and information if you will like to order/buy our complete written
material(s).
HOW TO RECEIVE PROJECT MATERIAL(S)
After paying the appropriate amount
(#5,000) into our bank Account below, send the following information to
08068231953 or 08168759420
(1) Your project
topics
(2) Email
Address
(3) Payment
Name
(4) Teller Number
We will send your material(s) after
we receive bank alert
BANK ACCOUNTS
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 0046579864
Bank: GTBank.
OR
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 2023350498
Bank: UBA.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL:
08068231953 or 08168759420
AFFILIATE
Comments
Post a Comment